As we get closer to the presidential election, and Donald Trump increasingly fears he is holding a losing hand, the bizarre description of “American Carnage” in Trump’s inauguration speech in 2017 becomes more ominously an uncanny prediction for 2020. In the 2016 presidential debates, former Florida governor Jeb Bush remarked that “Donald Trump is a chaos candidate, and he would be a chaos president.” Well, here we are.
Election Carnage
In the past several weeks, there has been a burst of bureaucratic chaos as Trump does his utmost to hold on to his base rather than to try to expand his appeal throughout the country. Trump clearly intends to contest mail-in ballots, and he expects to get a great deal of assistance from the huge number of judges his administration has appointed to appeals courts.
Census Carnage
The courts, including the Supreme Court are also involved in a Trump initiative to stop the census count, which would have an impact on calculating congressional seats for the next ten years as well as on the allocation of federal funding.
Carnage Avoided
Nevertheless, Donald Trump complained publicly that his attorney general, William Barr, wasn’t doing enough to investigate the efforts of the Obama administration to deny Trump his presidential victory in 2016. Trump blared that Hillary Clinton should be jailed, and that Joe Biden was a criminal who should be barred from running for the presidency. There is no precedent for a president in the heat of a reelection campaign to orchestrate an investigation by the Department of Justice of his opposition.
POSTSCRIPT: Rare Good News:
There is resistance within the Department of Justice against the enabling tactics of Attorney General Barr, but the mainstream media is not highlighting these examples. Last week, a veteran DoJ prosecutor accused Barr of abusing his powers to sway the election for Trump, and resigned from the department. He was the third senior prosecutor to issue a public rebuke of the attorney general. It is extremely unusual for DoJ lawyers to go public in discussing internal politics of the department.
The other piece of good news is from the Constitution itself, which gives the States responsibility for choosing the “Time, Places and Manner of holding Elections.” If the Trump and his enabler-in-chief, Bill Barr, try to interfere with the vote count in the November election, the Courts should uphold State laws on the process.
Return to Mel’s Analyses


1 Comment
by Steve Martin
In Barr’s recent announcement that with a little over a month left in his role as AG that he is exiting to “spend more time with family”, I believe that we see the proverbial final straw.
The question is what was it? Given Barr’s willingness to “dry run” Pinochet style actions on civil disturbance in Portland, OR and in Lafayette square it is clear to this writer that Trump was demanding support of his using the 1977 Emergency Act and PEADs (Presidential Executive Actions Documents) that would allow Trump to engage in suspending habeas corpus, seizing control of the internet, imposing censorship, and incarcerating so-called subversives. Again we saw Trumps attempts to test run these kinds of initiatives. It was hair raising to see how little objection there was by Democrats or the mainstream press in these extraordinary actions.
We must not be lulled into a false sense ease over the end of national nightmare. It’s just going into another phase